You describe the site. My AI intake layer sharpens the brief — purpose, audience, references, tone.
Then I build it by hand, to the same engineering standard as MAVERICK and SHADOW.
Not a template builder. Not a drag-drop SaaS. A real developer at the other end of the brief.
Two currently in production. Both live, both running real money, both shipped in weeks not months. This is the bar.
Most web projects fail at the briefing stage — wrong audience, wrong references, wrong tone. This form forces the answers that matter. Two minutes. Lands in my inbox. I reply within 24 hours with a quote and a mockup direction.
All one-off. No retainer handcuffs. Keep the source. Walk away whenever.
Yes, you can. It’s a fair question. Here’s the honest answer:
I use the same AI tools (v0, Cursor, Claude) on my end — that’s why prices can stay low. The difference is the polish layer: hand-tuned motion, proper typography, mobile edge cases, performance optimisation. Things AI still gets wrong without a developer watching.
Two minutes in the brief form. 24-hour reply. You’ll know within 48 hours whether we’re building.
Fill the brief →